People who build the builders
Agent harnesses, code generation, program analysis, verification, developer tooling.
for collaborators
Help advance the engineering.
For people improving how machines design, build and evaluate software. Especially people who will tell us we are wrong.
who this is for
Recognise yourself.
People who think about evidence
How do you know a change was an improvement? Our hardest question.
People who argue in writing
A position with a cost beats an introduction.
open lines of work
What we are actually working on.
| line of work | state |
|---|---|
| saying what is true about a system once | running |
| rules that refuse rather than rules remembered | running |
| more than one independent reading of a hard question | running |
| judging a change to how we work | building |
| quality read from the source | building |
| knowledge you can actually reach | ambition |
so nobody has to ask
Things we are not doing.
No training on your workNo weight update. Learning here means a corpus, not a model.
No loop that closes on itselfNothing acts on its own scores.
No settling by countingA tie is reported as a tie.
No claim of measured superiorityWe have not measured ourselves against anyone.
the next step
Tell us where you think we are wrong.
And what you are working on. An argument with a position in it is worth more to us than an introduction.
Contact routes publish at launch.